Skip to content

Conversation

ojeda
Copy link
Contributor

@ojeda ojeda commented Feb 17, 2025

Linux v6.14-rc3 contains commit 6273a058383e ("x86: rust: set rustc-abi=x86-softfloat on rustc>=1.86.0"), which resolves the error from #136146.

r? @lqd @Kobzol
try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux
@rustbot label A-rust-for-linux
@bors try

Linux v6.14-rc3 contains commit 6273a058383e ("x86: rust: set
rustc-abi=x86-softfloat on rustc>=1.86.0"), which resolves the error
from rust-lang#136146.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. A-rust-for-linux Relevant for the Rust-for-Linux project labels Feb 17, 2025
@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Feb 17, 2025

cool, hopefully bors wakes up soon to test it out

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Feb 17, 2025

hypothesis that bors doesn't look at the OP

@bors try

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2025
CI: rfl: move job forward to Linux v6.14-rc3

Linux v6.14-rc3 contains commit 6273a058383e ("x86: rust: set rustc-abi=x86-softfloat on rustc>=1.86.0"), which resolves the error from rust-lang#136146.

r? `@lqd` `@Kobzol`
try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux
`@rustbot` label A-rust-for-linux
`@bors` try
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 17, 2025

⌛ Trying commit f46c765 with merge 67a81d9...

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Feb 17, 2025

🤔

@ojeda
Copy link
Contributor Author

ojeda commented Feb 17, 2025

Maybe it doesn't like me... :(

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

Kobzol commented Feb 17, 2025

Yeah I think that bors doesn't look at PR descriptions.

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

Yeah I think that bors doesn't look at PR descriptions.

And also the top-level review comment

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Feb 17, 2025

While a robot uprising is not unlikely, IIUC bors will only look at posted comments @ojeda

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 17, 2025

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 67a81d9 (67a81d914c3942a6be201d3d5241307981856ed7)

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Feb 17, 2025

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 17, 2025

📌 Commit f46c765 has been approved by lqd

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 17, 2025
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#136959 (Simplify switch sources)
 - rust-lang#137020 (Pass vendored sources from bootstrap to generate-copyright)
 - rust-lang#137073 (boostrap: skip no_std targets in Std doc step)
 - rust-lang#137165 (Use `tell` for `<File as Seek>::stream_position`)
 - rust-lang#137166 (Update default loongarch code model in docs)
 - rust-lang#137168 (correct comment)
 - rust-lang#137169 (CI: rfl: move job forward to Linux v6.14-rc3)
 - rust-lang#137170 (Allow configuring jemalloc per target)
 - rust-lang#137173 (Subtree update of `rust-analyzer`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 8d72b7c into rust-lang:master Feb 18, 2025
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.87.0 milestone Feb 18, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#137169 - ojeda:rfl, r=lqd

CI: rfl: move job forward to Linux v6.14-rc3

Linux v6.14-rc3 contains commit 6273a058383e ("x86: rust: set rustc-abi=x86-softfloat on rustc>=1.86.0"), which resolves the error from rust-lang#136146.

r? `@lqd` `@Kobzol`
try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux
`@rustbot` label A-rust-for-linux
`@bors` try
@ojeda ojeda deleted the rfl branch February 18, 2025 12:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-rust-for-linux Relevant for the Rust-for-Linux project A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants