Skip to content

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Urgau and others added 12 commits October 1, 2024 10:01
Dedicating a week to work on rustc-dev-guide.
Implement RFC3695 Allow boolean literals as cfg predicates

This PR implements rust-lang/rfcs#3695: allow boolean literals as cfg predicates, i.e. `cfg(true)` and `cfg(false)`.

r? `@nnethercote` *(or anyone with parser knowledge)*
cc `@clubby789`
Use wide pointers consistenly across the compiler

This PR replace every use of "fat pointer" for the more recent "wide pointer" terminology.

Since some time T-lang as preferred the "wide pointer" terminology, as can be seen on [the last RFCs](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Arust-lang%2Frfcs+%22wide+pointer%22&type=code), on some [lints](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/lints/listing/warn-by-default.html#ambiguous-wide-pointer-comparisons), but also in [the reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/reference/expressions/operator-expr.html?highlight=wide%20pointer#pointer-to-pointer-cast).

Currently we have a [mix of both](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Arust-lang%2Frust+%22wide+pointer%22&type=code) (including in error messages), which isn't great, but with this PR no more.

r? `@jieyouxu` (feel free to re-roll)
…ddle

Enable `--no-sandbox` option by default for rustdoc GUI tests

It's apparently common enough for people to have issues with the `sandbox` mode in chromium, so better disable it by default.

r? `@notriddle`
Week off of reviews to focus on docs

Dedicating a week to work on rustc-dev-guide.
Should be back on Oct. 11/12.
@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Oct 4, 2024
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=4 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 4, 2024

📌 Commit 6d69af7 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 4, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 4, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 6d69af7 with merge c39f318...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 4, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing c39f318 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 4, 2024
@bors bors merged commit c39f318 into rust-lang:master Oct 4, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.83.0 milestone Oct 4, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#131034 Implement RFC3695 Allow boolean literals as cfg predicates efd76f58010b6c5dcc1f4917aabdfa0565a815fb (link)
#131202 Use wide pointers consistenly across the compiler 1c20c31550473b8c37f348bd78030f8d8d9df558 (link)
#131230 Enable --no-sandbox option by default for rustdoc GUI tes… 85f740a2cbdee324fa3016c91365164efd0ceaba (link)
#131232 Week off of reviews to focus on docs 8b6443af2c35ce512e3d99b28d76703af54dcc22 (link)

previous master: 267cf8d3b2

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (c39f318): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.3% [0.2%, 0.4%] 6
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.5%, secondary 0.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.6% [0.6%, 0.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.5% [-4.6%, -1.1%] 3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.5% [-4.6%, -1.1%] 3

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 771.923s -> 771.465s (-0.06%)
Artifact size: 342.02 MiB -> 342.03 MiB (0.00%)

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the rollup-il2i7z7 branch October 4, 2024 23:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants