Skip to content

Conversation

cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

@cjgillot cjgillot commented Nov 6, 2022

Drive-by: change how suggested generic args are computed.
Fixes #103815

I recommend reviewing commit-by-commit.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 6, 2022

r? @compiler-errors

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 6, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 6, 2022

Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy

cc @rust-lang/clippy

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 7, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #104083) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 12, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #103530) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 13, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #104282) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 17, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #104170) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

compiler-errors commented Nov 22, 2022

This is a pretty big PR to fix one issue 😆 , but I understand this is a lot of other subtle clean-ups as well. (edit: Actually the issue fix was just a drive-by!)

Anyways, I think I've convinced myself that this is correct.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 22, 2022

📌 Commit fd932ddbcd2e78fa9245b28f6028ef8a31630c05 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 22, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 22, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #104688) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 22, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 23, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #104776) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@cjgillot cjgillot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Nov 26, 2022
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor Author

simple rebase
@bors r=compiler-errors

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 26, 2022

📌 Commit 5de9c84 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 26, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 27, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 5de9c84 with merge 454784a...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 27, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: compiler-errors
Pushing 454784a to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 27, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 454784a into rust-lang:master Nov 27, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Nov 27, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (454784a): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.2% [0.2%, 0.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.2% [-2.2%, -2.2%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

@cjgillot cjgillot deleted the split-lifetime branch November 29, 2022 18:43
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2022
…errors

Separate lifetime ident from lifetime resolution in HIR

Drive-by: change how suggested generic args are computed.
Fixes rust-lang#103815

I recommend reviewing commit-by-commit.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

GAT in path suggests wrong lifetime name when elided lifetime is rejected
6 participants