-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
Rustup #3711
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
ty::Ref(_, tam, _) => match tam.sty { | ||
ty::Str => { | ||
let alloc = tcx.alloc_map.lock().unwrap_memory(ptr.alloc_id); | ||
let offset = ptr.offset.bytes().try_into().expect("too-large pointer offset"); | ||
let n = n as usize; | ||
let n = usize::try_from(n).unwrap(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Calling try_from()
just to instantly unwrap it looks odd.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea it is, but it's similar to foo.checked_add(bar).unwrap()
which prevents silent overflow irrelevant of the compiler flags.
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 6033294 has been approved by |
Rustup fixes #3709 I'm currently in the process of making rustc's deprecation lint emit the `AtomicFoo::new(0)` suggestion
☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor |
fixes #3709
I'm currently in the process of making rustc's deprecation lint emit the
AtomicFoo::new(0)
suggestion