Skip to content

Conversation

@ada4a
Copy link
Contributor

@ada4a ada4a commented Oct 19, 2025

According to the lint naming guidelines1, lint names should use the
plural form.

changelog: [empty_enum]: rename to empty_enums

Footnotes

  1. https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints

@rustbot rustbot added needs-fcp S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties labels Oct 19, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 19, 2025

r? @dswij

rustbot has assigned @dswij.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@ada4a
Copy link
Contributor Author

ada4a commented Oct 19, 2025

Depends on #15911, so @rustbot blocked

@rustbot rustbot added S-blocked Status: marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties labels Oct 19, 2025
@ada4a ada4a force-pushed the empty_enums branch 2 times, most recently from 52c60d6 to eb25f28 Compare October 19, 2025 22:48
@ada4a
Copy link
Contributor Author

ada4a commented Oct 20, 2025

PR was merged, so @rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties and removed S-blocked Status: marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work labels Oct 20, 2025
@dswij
Copy link
Member

dswij commented Oct 20, 2025

@ada4a thanks! Can we squash the commits?

According to the lint naming guidelines[^1], lint names should use the
plural form.

[^1]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 20, 2025

This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

@ada4a
Copy link
Contributor Author

ada4a commented Oct 20, 2025

It was just one commit, but on top of the two commits from the previous PR. Rebased^^

@ada4a

This comment was marked as outdated.

@dswij dswij added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 23, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit 09c3237 Oct 23, 2025
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 23, 2025
@ada4a ada4a deleted the empty_enums branch October 23, 2025 16:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants