-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
Move rustdoc-types
crate to T-Rustdoc ownership.
#3505
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 2 commits
4424e89
2997902
0570ccb
35485fd
c411988
6f0a689
ac9a6db
a7ee38e
5b53b84
ec35266
9c5b588
3eb2784
d54ae49
855194d
e0db5f7
4b4696d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ | ||
- Feature Name: `rustdoc_types_maintainers` | ||
- Start Date: (fill me in with today's date, YYYY-MM-DD) | ||
- RFC PR: [rust-lang/rfcs#0000](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/0000) | ||
- Rust Issue: [rust-lang/rust#0000](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/0000) | ||
|
||
# Summary | ||
[summary]: #summary | ||
|
||
The [rustdoc-types](https://crates.io/crates/rustdoc-types) crate will go from being privately maintained to being officially maintained by the rustdoc team. | ||
|
||
# Motivation | ||
[motivation]: #motivation | ||
|
||
[`rustdoc-types`](https://crates.io/crates/rustdoc-types) is a crate published on crates.io. It is used by users of the unstable [rustdoc JSON](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76578) backend to provided a type representing the output of `rustdoc --output-format json`. | ||
|
||
|
||
Currently I ([`@aDotInTheVoid`](https://github.com/aDotInTheVoid/)) maintain the `rustdoc-types` crate on [my personal github](https://github.com/aDotInTheVoid/rustdoc-types/). No-one else has either github or crates.io permissions. This means if I become unable (or more likely disinterested), the crate will not see updates. | ||
|
||
Additionally, if an update to `rustdoc-json-types` happens while i'm away from a computer for an extended period of time, their will be a delay in this update being published on crates.io. [This almost happened](https://github.com/aDotInTheVoid/rustdoc-types/issues/25), but was avoided due to the bors queue being quiet at the time. | ||
|
||
# Guide-level explanation | ||
[guide-level-explanation]: #guide-level-explanation | ||
|
||
This involves: | ||
|
||
1. Moving the [github.com/aDotInTheVoid/rustdoc-types](https://github.com/aDotInTheVoid/rustdoc-types/) repo to the `rust-lang` organization, and make `rust-lang/rustdoc` maintainers/owners. | ||
2. Move overship of `rustdoc-types` on crates.io to the rustdoc team. | ||
|
||
# Reference-level explanation | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. issue: I think we should carefully document what our versioning strategy is. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. For the crate, or the For the crate, the current approach is "Follow semver, and don't release 1.0.0 until stabilization". The post 1.0.0 versioning strategy will be figured out in concert with designing the format for post-stabilization evolution. How much detail on versioning strategy do you think this RFC needs? From a users POV, their should be no change from this, and new releases will be published in the same fashion as before. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The crate. We should both:
It's going to be an official Rust artefact, we need to be a bit clearer to our users. |
||
[reference-level-explanation]: #reference-level-explanation | ||
|
||
`rustdoc-types` is a republishing of the in-tree [`rustdoc-json-types`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/b8536c1aa1973dd2438841815b1eeec129480e45/src/rustdoc-json-types) crate. `rustdoc-json-types` is a dependency of `librustdoc`, and is the canonical source of truth for the canonical description of the rustdoc-json output format. Changes to the format are made a a PR to `rust-lang/rust`, and will modify `src/rustdoc-json-types`, `src/librustdoc/json` and `tests/rustdoc-json`. None of this will change. | ||
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
However, the publishing of this to crates.io, so that it can be used by out-of-tree tools that take rustdoc-json as an input | ||
([eg](https://github.com/awslabs/cargo-check-external-types/blob/dc15c5ee7674a495d807481402fee46fdbdbb140/Cargo.toml#L16), | ||
[eg](https://github.com/Enselic/cargo-public-api/blob/19f15ce4146835691d489ec9db3518e021b638e8/public-api/Cargo.toml#L27), | ||
[eg](https://github.com/obi1kenobi/trustfall-rustdoc-adapter/blob/92cbbf9bc6c9dfaf40bba8adfbc56c0bb7aff12f/Cargo.toml#L15)). This is done with [a scipt](https://github.com/aDotInTheVoid/rustdoc-types/blob/577a774c2433beda669271102a201910c4169c0c/update.sh) so that it is as low maintence as possible. This also ensures that all format/documentation changes happen in the rust-lang/rust repo, and go through the normal review process there. | ||
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
The update/publishing process will be moved to T-Rustdoc. In the medium term, I (`@aDotInTheVoid`) will still do it, but | ||
fmease marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
- In an offical capacity | ||
- With bus factor for when I stop. | ||
|
||
## Actual Mechanics of the move | ||
|
||
### Github | ||
|
||
Github has a [list of requirements](https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/creating-and-managing-repositories/transferring-a-repository) for transfering repositories. | ||
|
||
|
||
- When you transfer a repository that you own to another personal account, the new owner will receive a confirmation email. The confirmation email includes instructions for accepting the transfer. If the new owner doesn't accept the transfer within one day, the invitation will expire. | ||
- N/A: Not transfering to | ||
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
- To transfer a repository that you own to an organization, you must have permission to create a repository in the target organization. | ||
- I (`@aDotInTheVoid`) don't have create-repo perms in the `rust-lang` org. Therefor I'll add a member of T-Infra as an owner to `aDotInTheVoid/rustdoc-types` (I can't add teams, as it's not in an org). They'll then move it to the repo to the `rust-lang` org. Once moved, T-Infra can become owners. | ||
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
- The target account must not have a repository with the same name, or a fork in the same network. | ||
- OK. | ||
- The original owner of the repository is added as a collaborator on the transferred repository. Other collaborators to the transferred repository remain intact. | ||
- OK. After the transfer. T-Rustdoc should be added as a colaborator, and I should be removed so that I only have permissions via my membership in T-Rustdoc. | ||
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
- Single repositories forked from a private upstream network cannot be transferred. | ||
- OK. | ||
|
||
At the end of this we should have a crate in the rust-lang github org with T-Rustdoc as contributors, and T-infra as owners. | ||
|
||
### crates.io | ||
|
||
crats.io ownership is managed [via the command line](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/publishing.html#cargo-owner). | ||
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
I will run the following commands to move ownership. | ||
|
||
``` | ||
cargo owner --add github:rust-lang:owners | ||
cargo owner --add rust-lang-owner | ||
cargo owner --remove aDotInTheVoid | ||
``` | ||
|
||
The `rust-lang-owner` is neaded because team owners cannot add new owners. | ||
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
# Drawbacks | ||
[drawbacks]: #drawbacks | ||
|
||
- Adds additional maintenence burden to rustdoc team. | ||
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
- One-time maintenece burden to infra team to support move. | ||
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
|
||
# Rationale and alternatives | ||
[rationale-and-alternatives]: #rationale-and-alternatives | ||
|
||
- We could keep `rustdoc-types` as a personal project. This preserves the status quo (and is what will happen if this RFC (or something similar) isn't addopted). This is undesirable because | ||
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
- Bus factor: If I am unable or unwilling to maintain `rustdoc-types`, we cause a load of unnessessary churn when it becomes out of sync with | ||
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
- We could bundle `rustdoc-types` through rustup. This is undesirable as it means users can't depend on it in stable rust, and can't depend on multiple versions. | ||
- We could publish `rustdoc-json-types` directly from `rust-lang/rust`. However | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hmm, I am a little concerned about having a separate repo because it would mean every PR that increases FORMAT_VERSION would also necessitate a separate PR to a different repo. Is there a downside to publishing from a folder in rust-lang/rust instead (or maybe even a git subtree)? See also my comments below about merging it with rustdoc-json-types, though my main concern is requiring multiple PRs. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW, this is how it's always been done, but that's defiantly not sufficient justification that it's the best way.
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Whats your concern with multiple PR's? Given that there's already a publish step, I don't think it cuts down on work (unless we autopublish from rust-lang/rust PR's, which I'm not fully comfortable with) We could land this now (primarily for bus-factor reasons), and then move change things separately if it becomes a problem. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair enough since all that's needed to update the repo is to run a script.
Yeah, I guess that makes sense since it wouldn't even need a whole RFC for a small administrative change like that. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, the impression I got from the RFC text was you wanted publishing to happen almost as soon as the format version changed. I agree that there's benefit to reviewing the changes before publishing a new crate version. |
||
- `rust-lang/rust` doesn't currently publish to crates.io. | ||
- `rustdoc-json-types` doesn't currently bump the version field in cargo.toml | ||
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
- It may be desirable to use different types in rustdoc vs users, eg to have a specialized version of `Id` that doesn't allocate | ||
- `rustdoc-types` is a nicer name, and what people already depend on. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This seems irrelevant since we could just rename There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That's fair. |
||
|
||
|
||
# Prior art | ||
[prior-art]: #prior-art | ||
|
||
- [Rust RFC 3119](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3119-rust-crate-ownership.html) establishes the Rust crate ownership policy. Under it's categories, `rustdoc-types` would be a **Intentional artifact** | ||
fmease marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
- [Some old zulip discussion about why `rustdoc-json-types` was created.](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-t-rustdoc/topic/JSON.20Format/near/223685843) What was said then is that if T-Rustdoc want's to publish a crate, it needs to go through an RFC. This is that RFC. | ||
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
# Unresolved questions | ||
[unresolved-questions]: #unresolved-questions | ||
|
||
None yet | ||
|
||
# Future possibilities | ||
[future-possibilities]: #future-possibilities | ||
|
||
When the rustdoc-json feature is stabilized, we'll should release 1.0.0 to crates.io. How we can evolve the format post stabilization is an unanswered question. It's a blocker for stabilization, but not this RFC | ||
aDotInTheVoid marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.