Skip to content

Conversation

joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

These targets seem to regularly break unrelated PRs, and in general we
shouldn't gate PRs on tier 3 targets (per the target tier policy).

These targets seem to regularly break unrelated PRs, and in general we
shouldn't gate PRs on tier 3 targets (per the target tier policy).
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 6, 2024

r? @JohnTitor

rustbot has assigned @JohnTitor.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

@joshtriplett This doesn't seem to remove all tier 3 targets, can we identify this PR as singling out the Switch and μClibc targets?

@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member Author

@joshtriplett This doesn't seem to remove all tier 3 targets, can we identify this PR as singling out the Switch and μClibc targets?

I had intended for it to, but clearly I've missed some that weren't labeled as such.

@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

Maybe I'm mistaken?

@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

This was merged via #3797.

@tgross35 tgross35 closed this Aug 12, 2024
@joshtriplett joshtriplett deleted the ci-no-tier-3 branch August 15, 2024 08:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants