glossary: Unicode: refer to the Consortium's one, not ISO/IEC's #617
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The Unicode Standard and ISO/IEC 10646 are different standards [1].
Since
fls_jpecw46eh061refers to a Unicode Standard version, change the glossary entry to point to the Consortium's standard instead.This may also make it easier to refer to future versions since there may be no published ISO/IEC standard for that version, at least for some time.
The description between "is" and "described" is taken from Chapter 1 ("Introduction") of the Core Specification.
The version is not specified since it is already noted elsewhere (and, in principle, it could be possible that different parts refer to different versions -- if that is not desirable, it may make sense to move the version here instead, like for the C standard one).
Fixes: #155
Fixes: #156
Link: https://www.unicode.org/faq/unicode_iso [1]