Add audit trail to the publish, yank and unyank transactions.#1700
Add audit trail to the publish, yank and unyank transactions.#1700bors merged 6 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
|
What recommendations would you have on what should be unit tested? |
5da6778 to
d03686b
Compare
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #1677) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
bae2a11 to
5c8db82
Compare
5c8db82 to
0fbb832
Compare
79ce0b6 to
15856bc
Compare
|
I'd like to see some integration tests for this as well |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #1599) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
c4db368 to
6a0c3e6
Compare
|
Sorry that I left this alone for so long. I noticed that @carols10cents merged PR 1604 that this was based on so I've updated this PR and made the changes suggested. Some of the changes @sgrif made are related to code that's already been merged. I have not made these, and @carols10cents and @sgrif will have to decide which of these should be made. |
653a122 to
2213b9c
Compare
carols10cents
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@markcatley I'm sorry we left this PR for so long! Thank you so much for sticking with it. I think we should definitely add some NOT NULL constraints as mentioned, and I would merge either way on renaming the fields in this PR or not.
464cb34 to
73c7238
Compare
|
Hi @carols10cents @sgrif, I think it's probably a good idea to rename those fields. Never an easier time than when the table is unused (I hope). I believe all the changes have now been made. Kind regards, |
34b9bf8 to
88d9ec0
Compare
88d9ec0 to
8d35e31
Compare
carols10cents
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is getting really close! I just noticed a few small things on my latest read through-- please change the underscores in the parameter names and the comments in the tests where noted. Thank you!!
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #1911) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #1927) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
The first audit action test covers testing that a crate starts without any audit actions, and it's unlikely these assertions will ever fail.
|
I've resolved the merge conflicts and made the small outstanding fixes so that we can merge this in, which I'll do once CI passes :) Thanks! |
all comments have been addressed
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 4d7f8a8 has been approved by |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-travis |
Contributes to Issue 1548
Based on the commits from PR 1604