-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
text_dir_codepoint lint update #16452
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
enthropy7
wants to merge
2
commits into
rust-lang:master
Choose a base branch
from
enthropy7:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+743
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,16 +1,19 @@ | ||
| mod blanket_hint_mostly_unused; | ||
| mod im_a_teapot; | ||
| mod implicit_minimum_version_req; | ||
| mod text_direction_codepoint; | ||
| mod unknown_lints; | ||
|
|
||
| pub use blanket_hint_mostly_unused::blanket_hint_mostly_unused; | ||
| pub use im_a_teapot::check_im_a_teapot; | ||
| pub use implicit_minimum_version_req::implicit_minimum_version_req; | ||
| pub use text_direction_codepoint::text_direction_codepoint; | ||
| pub use unknown_lints::output_unknown_lints; | ||
|
|
||
| pub const LINTS: &[crate::lints::Lint] = &[ | ||
| blanket_hint_mostly_unused::LINT, | ||
| implicit_minimum_version_req::LINT, | ||
| im_a_teapot::LINT, | ||
| text_direction_codepoint::LINT, | ||
| unknown_lints::LINT, | ||
| ]; |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had forgotten that we had separate issues. The question is whether we should mirror rustc or lint them together. I had overlooked this conversation in #16374, focusing on the other parts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A good starting point would be to check the history of rustc as to why they made them separate lints.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think it’s easier to keep lints together cause we parse cargo in raw format so, but i will check and come back later after new year :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
rustc separated the lints because in Rust code, BiDi in string literals might be legitimate (RTL language support) while in comments it's always suspicious. In TOML there's no such distinction - BiDi anywhere in a manifest is suspicious (no legitimate RTL use case for dependency names/versions). Single lint makes sense for Cargo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This sounds reasonable to me. Thanks for the investigation!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
package.description,package.metadata, andworkspace.metadatado up some possibilities.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For those cases users can set
text_direction_codepoint="warn"or"allow"in[lints.cargo]. Deny-by-default is still appropriate since legitimate RTL in manifests is rareThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are likely valid reasons for
package.descriptionto have text direction code points, e.g. if they are written in a non-english language that uses a different direction. This becomes even bigger of a deal for*.metadata.My main concern is actually around performance. I was going to suggest we start this as one lint and if there is enough of a motivating case, we split this into two lints with the current lint becoming a lint group. However, in thinking that through, I realized we can easily implement this lint without much of a performance impact.
The way I see this working is we have one function for checking both lints. This function would do a string search for the different code points in question in the
Cargo.toml, collecting their spans. If they are not present, we bail out. If they are present, we usetoml_parserto createEvents. We then iterate through all of theEvents to see if they include the span in question and based onEventKind, we choose which lint to fire.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i already started to work on your suggestion, forgot to answer. thanks, i like your idea, will push new method soon