Skip to content

Conversation

@damoasda
Copy link
Contributor

The text sometimes still refers to if let instead to let...else.
This PR updates the text accordingly.

@damoasda
Copy link
Contributor Author

Resolved merge conflicts. Most changes are fixed in the meanwhile, but there is still one open issue.

@carols10cents
Copy link
Member

You're correct that the "match/doesn't match" doesn't go with the "execute/skip" correctly, but with the change here, I don't think the "giving it a way to continue validly" makes sense anymore. I've decided to fix this slightly differently in #4564. Thanks though!

@damoasda damoasda deleted the fix-ch19-02 branch November 8, 2025 17:48
@damoasda
Copy link
Contributor Author

damoasda commented Nov 8, 2025

You are welcome. Thank you for the update, @carols10cents!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants