-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 301
Add announcement for metrics initiative #1378
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ | ||
--- | ||
layout: post | ||
title: "Announcing the Metrics Initiative" | ||
author: Jane Losare-Lusby and Esteban Kuber | ||
team: The Rust Compiler Team <https://www.rust-lang.org/governance/teams/compiler> | ||
--- | ||
|
||
We ([Jane](https://github.com/yaahc/) and [Esteban](https://github.com/estebank)) are excited to announce the start of the Metrics initiative. | ||
|
||
We're envisioning three use cases for metrics within rustc. | ||
|
||
* Supporting feature development | ||
* e.g., answering specific questions such as when the old and new trait solvers diverge or helping identify and resolve bugs before impacting users | ||
* Guiding improvements to User Experience, | ||
* e.g., knowing which compiler errors are causing the most confusion or are hit the most frequently, focusing on improving those first, and verifying that the improvements help | ||
* Improving perf feedback loops and insight, | ||
* e.g., helping identify pathological edge cases, similar to work @nnethercote has done manually in the past | ||
yaahc marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
We're at the point of the initiative where we would like to inform the project members about it and start implementing the metrics infrastructure in collaboration with their real-world needs. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Discussion: would we want to explicitly mention here that the initiative fully intends to respect user privacy (i.e. no automated uploads / networking)
as mentioned in the tracking issue? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. My preference is to direct people to the tracking issue and keep the blog post as concise as possible. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think it's incredibly important to mention this in the first sentence in the blog post. If we don't say this clearly, people will get the wrong impression. Most people won't care enough to read the tracking issue or anything other than the blog post, and they shouldn't get wrong impressions from it. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. For example,
"metrics" sounds very ambiguous There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I've applied the suggested wording from @Kobzol below which I believe resolves this concern |
||
|
||
For more information about the initiative, please check out the tracking issue and related links: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128914. | ||
|
||
**Please reach out with any use cases you have in mind!** | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Suggestion: we probably want to make clear that we actively want and appreciate users to register their concerns, feedback and suggestions, and not just what the metrics infra could be used for. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.