-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initial CI setup and a few tests #21
Conversation
62fc5ff
to
ed8a273
Compare
b3504f4
to
1487672
Compare
This reverts commit c073a0f. At that point in the workflow we do not even have `rustup`.
tests/integration/failing/array.rs
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Most files in this directory fail the test because their functions
array content is not deterministic, the integers paired with the function names are different in different runs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test fails because of a Static
element in the allocs
. None of the other tests EDIT: A few of the other tests also have such a Static
element.
- name: 'Clean up toolchain' | ||
if: always() | ||
run: | | ||
make rustup-clear-toolchain |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is important, otherwise the build will leave a dangling toolchain behind that rustup
stumbles upon during setup. I opened a ticket for this against dtolnay/rust-toolchain@
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like a solution is already merged @jberthold
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay it all looks sensible to me. I think this is great for merge
jq
)Related: #20