Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 25, 2024. It is now read-only.

Allowing multiple constraints in splits preceding nodes to be refuted #1066

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Apr 6, 2024

Conversation

PetarMax
Copy link
Contributor

@PetarMax PetarMax commented Apr 5, 2024

Currently, the refutation mechanism cannot handle the case in which the split preceding the node to be refuted contains more than one constraint. Such scenarios, however, have become commonplace given the newly introduced KCFG minimization mechanism.

This PR extends the refutation mechanism by allowing it to handle splits with multiple constraints.

@PetarMax PetarMax added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 5, 2024
@PetarMax PetarMax requested review from ehildenb and lucasmt April 5, 2024 09:24
@PetarMax PetarMax self-assigned this Apr 5, 2024
@PetarMax PetarMax marked this pull request as ready for review April 5, 2024 10:55
@PetarMax PetarMax requested a review from tothtamas28 April 5, 2024 10:55
@rv-jenkins rv-jenkins merged commit be4edd6 into master Apr 6, 2024
12 checks passed
@rv-jenkins rv-jenkins deleted the petar/refute-with-multiple-constraints branch April 6, 2024 10:43
Baltoli pushed a commit to runtimeverification/k that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
…runtimeverification/pyk#1066)

Currently, the refutation mechanism cannot handle the case in which the
split preceding the node to be refuted contains more than one
constraint. Such scenarios, however, have become commonplace given the
newly introduced KCFG minimization mechanism.

This PR extends the refutation mechanism by allowing it to handle splits
with multiple constraints.

---------

Co-authored-by: devops <[email protected]>
Baltoli pushed a commit to runtimeverification/k that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
…runtimeverification/pyk#1066)

Currently, the refutation mechanism cannot handle the case in which the
split preceding the node to be refuted contains more than one
constraint. Such scenarios, however, have become commonplace given the
newly introduced KCFG minimization mechanism.

This PR extends the refutation mechanism by allowing it to handle splits
with multiple constraints.

---------

Co-authored-by: devops <[email protected]>
Baltoli pushed a commit to runtimeverification/k that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2024
…runtimeverification/pyk#1066)

Currently, the refutation mechanism cannot handle the case in which the
split preceding the node to be refuted contains more than one
constraint. Such scenarios, however, have become commonplace given the
newly introduced KCFG minimization mechanism.

This PR extends the refutation mechanism by allowing it to handle splits
with multiple constraints.

---------

Co-authored-by: devops <[email protected]>
Baltoli pushed a commit to runtimeverification/k that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2024
…runtimeverification/pyk#1066)

Currently, the refutation mechanism cannot handle the case in which the
split preceding the node to be refuted contains more than one
constraint. Such scenarios, however, have become commonplace given the
newly introduced KCFG minimization mechanism.

This PR extends the refutation mechanism by allowing it to handle splits
with multiple constraints.

---------

Co-authored-by: devops <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
automerge enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants