Skip to content

Conversation

@Zimmi48
Copy link
Member

@Zimmi48 Zimmi48 commented May 5, 2020

If the description field of a dependency is not provided, the description of the project itself was used instead. We avoid this by renaming the former field, and we default to using the opam name when
the description is not provided.

This avoids an issue reported by @gmalecha on Gitter (https://gitter.im/coq-community/Lobby?at=5eb0827b14b48f0698ac6a3d).

If the description field of a dependency is not provided, the
description of the project itself was used instead.  We avoid this by
renaming the former field, and we default to using the opam name when
the description is not provided.
@gmalecha
Copy link

gmalecha commented May 5, 2020

It would be nice if you didn't need to rename the field, but it should work this way.

@Zimmi48
Copy link
Member Author

Zimmi48 commented May 6, 2020

Yes, but I don't know how to avoid this.

@Zimmi48 Zimmi48 marked this pull request as draft May 23, 2020 13:54
@Zimmi48
Copy link
Member Author

Zimmi48 commented May 23, 2020

If we want to finish this, the documentation in ref.yml should be updated accordingly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants