Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: retire deprecated api #1055

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aojunhao123
Copy link

@aojunhao123 aojunhao123 commented Jan 17, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 新功能

  • Bug 修复

  • 重构

    • 优化了滑块组件(Slider)的实现
    • 移除了一些已弃用的属性和回调函数
    • 更新了事件处理机制
    • 简化了测试用例
  • 文档

    • 更新了滑块组件的使用示例以反映新的事件处理和样式结构
  • 样式

    • 将滑块组件的样式属性合并为一个统一的样式对象
  • 测试

    • 更新了滑块组件的测试用例
    • 移除了一些不再需要的测试
  • 其他

    • 在 .gitignore 中添加了 .vscode 目录
    • 改进了代码的整体可读性和维护性

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 17, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
slider ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 17, 2025 5:44pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

总览

变更说明

此次变更包括将 .vscode 目录添加到 .gitignore 文件中,以防止 Git 跟踪该目录中的文件。此外,src/Slider.tsx 文件中的 Slider 组件进行了多项修改,包括移除已弃用的属性和回调,优化事件处理逻辑,并引入统一的样式管理方式。测试文件 tests/Range.test.tsxtests/Slider.test.jstests/common.test.js 中的测试用例也进行了相应的精简和更新,以适应组件的变化。最后,文档示例文件中的 Slider 组件用法也进行了调整,以符合新的 API 格式。

变更

文件 变更摘要
.gitignore 添加 .vscode 目录到忽略列表
src/Slider.tsx 移除已弃用的属性,如 countonBeforeChangeonAfterChange;引入新的样式管理方式;优化事件处理逻辑
tests/Range.test.tsx 移除部分测试用例;更新断言方法
tests/Slider.test.js 简化测试用例,移除 onBeforeChangeonAfterChange 相关检查
tests/common.test.js 移除关于 onAfterChange 的已弃用测试用例
docs/examples/range.tsx 更新 Slider 组件的事件处理和样式管理方式
docs/examples/slider.tsx 更新 Slider 组件的事件处理和样式管理方式

诗歌

🐰 代码如流水,变化如兔跃
.vscode 悄然隐藏
滑块组件轻盈重生
测试用例整装待发
重构的魔法,悄然绽放! 🌟

序列图

由于变更主要涉及代码重构和测试调整,不生成序列图。


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/Range.test.tsx (2)

171-171: 统一断言方法以提高可读性

expect(onAfterChange).not.toBeCalled(); 改为 expect(onAfterChange).not.toHaveBeenCalled();,使断言方法更加直观和一致。


556-556: 统一断言方法以提高可读性

expect(handleFocus).toBeCalled(); 改为 expect(handleFocus).toHaveBeenCalled();,保持了断言方法的统一性。

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 17d087d and 42725ff.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • src/Slider.tsx (6 hunks)
  • tests/Range.test.tsx (2 hunks)
  • tests/Slider.test.js (2 hunks)
  • tests/common.test.js (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • tests/common.test.js
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .gitignore
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/Slider.tsx (6)

244-245: 确保处理单值和数组的情况

在处理 mergedValue 时,代码正确地将其统一为数组形式,确保了后续逻辑的一致性。


254-256: 当值未定义时提供默认值

mergedValueundefined 时,代码将 returnValues 设置为 [mergedMin, mergedMin]。请确认这符合预期行为,避免产生意外的默认值。


360-360: 在空的 rawValues 情况下添加新值

当启用范围且 rawValues 为空时,代码会在 cloneNextValues 中添加 newValue。请确保在这种情况下添加的新值不会导致后续逻辑错误。


550-550: 为轨道添加样式支持

div 元素上添加了 style={styles?.rail},这使得轨道样式可以通过外部传入的样式对象进行定制。


556-556: Tracks 组件添加样式支持

通过传递 style={styles?.track},现在可以自定义 Tracks 组件的样式,增强了组件的灵活性。


574-574: Handles 组件添加样式支持

增加了 style={styles?.handle},允许外部自定义 Handles 组件的样式,更好地适应不同的样式需求。

tests/Slider.test.js (2)

565-580: 更新测试以验证 onChange 回调

修改了测试用例,确保在滑块被点击时,onChange 回调函数被正确调用,符合组件的预期行为。


662-662: 验证当 value 未定义时的组件行为

测试在 valueundefinednulltooltip 打开时,组件是否正常运行,确保组件的稳定性。

tests/Range.test.tsx (1)

175-175: 移除 count 参数后更新测试用例

删除了对 count={3} 的使用,直接提供值数组来测试多段滑块的渲染。请确保组件在移除 count 参数后仍然正常工作。

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
docs/examples/range.tsx (1)

228-235: 样式 API 已统一

将独立的样式属性 (trackStyle, handleStyle, railStyle) 合并为统一的 styles 对象是一个好的改进。建议删除注释掉的旧代码。

-      // trackStyle={[{ backgroundColor: 'red' }, { backgroundColor: 'green' }]}
-      // handleStyle={[{ backgroundColor: 'yellow' }, { backgroundColor: 'gray' }]}
-      // railStyle={{ backgroundColor: 'black' }}
docs/examples/slider.tsx (2)

235-245: 样式配置已更新,但可以优化

新的 styles API 实现正确,但样式对象的结构可以更简洁。建议将相同的属性分组。

 styles={{
-  rail: { backgroundColor: 'red', height: 10 },
-  track: { backgroundColor: 'blue', height: 10 },
+  rail: { 
+    backgroundColor: 'red', 
+    height: 10 
+  },
+  track: { 
+    backgroundColor: 'blue', 
+    height: 10 
+  },
   handle: {
     borderColor: 'blue',
     height: 28,
     width: 28,
     marginLeft: -14,
     marginTop: -9,
     backgroundColor: 'black',
   },
 }}

277-287: 建议提取重复的样式配置

相同的样式配置在多个地方重复出现,建议提取为常量以提高可维护性。

+const sliderStyles = {
+  track: { backgroundColor: 'blue', height: 10 },
+  handle: {
+    borderColor: 'blue',
+    height: 28,
+    width: 28,
+    marginLeft: -14,
+    marginTop: -9,
+    backgroundColor: 'black',
+  },
+  rail: { backgroundColor: 'red', height: 10 },
+};

-styles={{
-  track: { backgroundColor: 'blue', height: 10 },
-  handle: {
-    borderColor: 'blue',
-    height: 28,
-    width: 28,
-    marginLeft: -14,
-    marginTop: -9,
-    backgroundColor: 'black',
-  },
-  rail: { backgroundColor: 'red', height: 10 },
-}}
+styles={sliderStyles}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 42725ff and e235675.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/examples/range.tsx (2 hunks)
  • docs/examples/slider.tsx (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/examples/range.tsx (2)

220-221: range 属性格式已更新

range 从布尔值更改为对象配置({ minCount: 3 })提供了更灵活的范围控制。这是一个突破性的改变。

建议:

  1. 更新组件文档以反映新的 API 格式
  2. 考虑添加向后兼容层以支持布尔值用法

196-196: 事件处理器已更新

onBeforeChange 更改为 onChange 是 API 更新的一部分。请确保所有依赖此组件的代码都已相应更新。

docs/examples/slider.tsx (1)

201-201: 事件处理器更改保持一致

与 range.tsx 中的更改一致,这里也将事件处理器从 onBeforeChange 更改为 onChange

/** @deprecated Please use `styles.handle` instead */
handleStyle?: React.CSSProperties | React.CSSProperties[];
/** @deprecated Please use `styles.rail` instead */
railStyle?: React.CSSProperties;
dotStyle?: React.CSSProperties | ((dotValue: number) => React.CSSProperties);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

看起来这两个 miss 了,是不是已经有平替了?下面那个也是

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants