Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Remove findDOMNode #13

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Enigama
Copy link

@Enigama Enigama commented Jan 8, 2025

Issue: ant-design/ant-design#52115

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 重构

    • 更新了 MutateObserver 组件中目标状态的类型定义
    • 简化了目标设置逻辑,移除了对 findDOMNode 的依赖
  • 测试

    • 移除了与 findDOMNode 相关的测试用例
    • 保留了检查 onMutate 属性功能的测试
  • 代码风格

    • 调整了 useMutateObserver 文件中的代码缩进,提高了代码可读性

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2025

总览

代码变更解析

步骤说明

本次代码变更主要涉及 MutateObserver 组件和相关测试文件的修改,重点包括类型定义调整和代码结构优化。

变更详情

步骤

文件 变更摘要
src/MutateObserver.tsx 目标状态类型从 HTMLElement 扩展为 `HTMLElement
src/useMutateObserver.tsx 代码缩进调整,功能保持不变
tests/index.test.tsx 移除了与 findDOMNode 相关的测试用例

序列图

sequenceDiagram
    participant React
    participant MutateObserver
    participant DOMNode
    React->>MutateObserver: 初始化组件
    MutateObserver->>DOMNode: 设置观察目标
    DOMNode-->>MutateObserver: 返回目标引用
Loading

代码兔子庆祝诗

🐰 代码改动如春风,
类型更宽松欢畅,
重构如轻风拂柳,
测试精简显智慧,
兔子欢跳庆代码!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/MutateObserver.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-50: 建议优化错误处理和类型定义

  1. 建议改进开发环境下的错误提示:
 if (process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production') {
-  console.error('MutationObserver need children props');
+  console.error('MutationObserver requires children props.');
 }
  1. 考虑为 children 添加更严格的类型定义,以提供更好的类型安全性。
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e0403d2 and edfeb05.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/MutateObserver.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/useMutateObserver.tsx (1 hunks)
  • tests/index.test.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/useMutateObserver.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/index.test.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-31: 测试用例简化符合预期!

删除了 findDOMNode 相关的测试用例,保留了对 onMutate 功能的核心测试。这种简化使测试更加清晰和专注。

src/MutateObserver.tsx (3)

25-25: 状态类型更新增强了类型安全性

将 target 状态的类型从 HTMLElement 扩展为 HTMLElement | DomWrapper 提供了更好的类型支持。


32-32: 目标元素设置逻辑优化

移除了 findDOMNode 的使用,代之以更直接的引用访问方式,这是一个很好的改进:

  • ✅ 符合 React 最佳实践
  • ✅ 代码更简洁清晰
  • ✅ 避免了 findDOMNode 的废弃警告

27-27: 验证类型断言的必要性

建议检查是否可以通过重构 useMutateObserver 的类型定义来避免这个类型断言。

运行以下脚本来分析 useMutateObserver 的使用情况:

✅ Verification successful

类型断言的使用是合理的

经过验证,这个类型断言是必要的:

  • useMutateObserver 需要 HTMLElement 类型的参数来设置 DOM 观察器
  • target 的类型是 HTMLElement | DomWrapper 的联合类型
  • 运行时逻辑确保了传入的 target 实际上是 HTMLElement

移除类型断言会增加不必要的代码复杂度,当前实现是合理的。

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 搜索 useMutateObserver 的其他用法
ast-grep --pattern 'useMutateObserver($_, $_, $_)'

Length of output: 141


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find type definition of useMutateObserver
ast-grep --pattern 'function useMutateObserver'

# Get the full content of MutateObserver.tsx to understand context
cat src/MutateObserver.tsx

Length of output: 1633


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check useMutateObserver implementation
cat src/useMutateObserver.ts || cat src/useMutateObserver.tsx

# Check DomWrapper implementation
cat src/wrapper.ts || cat src/wrapper.tsx

Length of output: 1343

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.77%. Comparing base (e0403d2) to head (edfeb05).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/useMutateObserver.tsx 75.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #13      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.37%   77.77%   -0.61%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines          37       36       -1     
  Branches       12       13       +1     
==========================================
- Hits           29       28       -1     
  Misses          7        7              
  Partials        1        1              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Enigama Enigama closed this Jan 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants