-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 231
Add CMake option for disabling legacy MR interface #2089
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
32 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8ee9f16
Add CMake options for making legacy MR interface configurable
bdice 5bb56db
Implement more legacy blocks, require CCCL 3.1+
bdice 52b5368
Refactor to ifdef
bdice 324dd0e
Refactor call sites to new CCCL MR interface
bdice c6c5268
Refactor host, pinned, and pinned_host MRs
bdice b197014
Refactoring to use CCCL MR interface
bdice 4014ad8
Refactoring to use CCCL MR interface
bdice 2cc5caa
Continue refactoring
bdice 8bff193
Continue refactoring
bdice ab39683
Continue refactoring
bdice f4f25be
Complete internal refactoring to use CCCL MR interface
bdice 390e2c5
Fix README error
bdice 606b414
Use CCCL MR interface in Cython
bdice 406a990
Hardcode alignment
bdice cd2145d
Use _stream member
bdice d7b39b6
Merge branch 'main' into make-legacy-interface-configurable
trxcllnt 879f6aa
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into make-legacy-interfa…
bdice 66c58db
Don't overallocate for alignment
bdice 244fc6c
Remove using declaration
bdice 378f69a
Merge branch 'main' into make-legacy-interface-configurable
bdice 827af4b
Use CCCL MR interface in benchmarks
bdice c72c067
Merge branch 'make-legacy-interface-configurable' of github.com:bdice…
bdice 69d4161
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into make-legacy-interfa…
bdice 2e62232
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into make-legacy-interfa…
bdice 8b18b8e
Skip pytorch tests if not using a CUDA build
bdice ceb08ef
Stop aligning up sizes
bdice bb41214
Fix statistics tests
bdice df57fb3
Fix tracking MR sizes
bdice b118aa7
Add Cython overload with no alignment, since Cython doesn't seem to p…
bdice a7b15fc
Remove alignment overloads
bdice 780b025
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into make-legacy-interfa…
bdice 6b70843
Merge branch 'main' into make-legacy-interface-configurable
bdice File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK so the idea is that the
cccl_resource_refmodels our old setup whereallocate-> synchronous andallocate_async-> stream-ordered.Whereas
async_cccl_resource_refisallocate_sync-> synchronous andallocate-> stream-ordered.Since currently we assume
allocateis synchronous we need to adapt everyone to that first. And the way to do that is to migrate everyone usingallocateto useallocate_sync. Then we can move them onto theasync_cccl_resource_refconcept and then we can move sync allocations that could be async back toallocate?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally that's the right direction.
The migration here is actually a little easier than stated above, because the signature for
allocatechanged too (in addition to changing sync-to-async). Disabling the "legacy" interface will cause a compile error anywhere the old interface was being used, allowing us to migrate to the new API names and new parameter order in each RAPIDS repository. I am starting that migration now. :)Once that migration is complete, I will deprecate the "legacy" interface (at which point RAPIDS should not be using the legacy interface at all), then remove it in the subsequent release.