Skip to content

Conversation

@zhravan
Copy link
Collaborator

@zhravan zhravan commented Jan 10, 2026

Issue

Link to related issue(s):


Description

Short summary of what this PR changes or introduces.


Scope of Change

Select all applicable areas impacted by this PR:

  • View (UI/UX)
  • API
  • CLI
  • Infra / Deployment
  • Docs
  • Other (specify): ________

Screenshot / Video / GIF (if applicable)

Attach or embed screenshots, screen recordings, or GIFs demonstrating the feature or fix.


Related PRs (if any)

Link any related or dependent PRs across repos.


Additional Notes for Reviewers (optional)

Anything reviewers should know before testing or merging (e.g., environment variables, setup steps).


Developer Checklist

To be completed by the developer who raised the PR.

  • Add valid/relevant title for the PR
  • Self-review done
  • Manual dev testing done
  • No secrets exposed
  • No merge conflicts
  • Docs added/updated (if applicable)
  • Removed debug prints / secrets / sensitive data
  • Unit / Integration tests passing
  • Follows all standards defined in Nixopus Docs

Reviewer Checklist

To be completed by the reviewer before merge.

  • Peer review done
  • No console.logs / fmt.prints left
  • No secrets exposed
  • If any DB migrations, migration changes are verified
  • Verified release changes are production-ready

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 10, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@zhravan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zhravan commented Jan 12, 2026

@coderabbitai: Provide a valid title

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 12, 2026

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

@zhravan, I'll help you provide a valid title for this PR. Let me first gather information about the changes in this PR.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash

# Get the PR details including current title and changed files
gh pr view 931 --json title,body,files --jq '.'

# Get the list of changed files with their patch
gh pr diff 931

Length of output: 22416


@zhravan, I've analyzed the PR changes. The current title "Css/enhancements" is completely incorrect - this PR has nothing to do with CSS!

The PR actually includes:

  1. Task queue reliability improvements - Added retry logic (0→3 retries), improved logging with retry tracking, and adjusted worker configurations
  2. Redis consumer lifecycle management - Dead consumer cleanup, idempotent consumer startup, and graceful shutdown
  3. Minor frontend fix - Sidebar navigation sync with pathname

Here are my title suggestions following conventional commit format:

Recommended:

feat(queue): add retry logic and consumer lifecycle management to task queues

Alternatives:

feat(queue): improve task queue reliability with retry mechanism and dead consumer cleanup
feat: enhance deployment task queues with retry logic and Redis consumer management

Would you like me to update the PR title using the GitHub CLI?


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Show current PR title for confirmation
gh pr view 931 --json title --jq '.title'

Length of output: 16


@zhravan, I've confirmed the current title is indeed "Css/enhancements".

Which of the suggested titles would you like me to use? Or would you prefer a different title? Once you confirm, I can update the PR title for you immediately.

My top recommendation:

feat(queue): add retry logic and consumer lifecycle management to task queues

Just let me know which one you prefer, or provide your own title, and I'll update it! 👍

@zhravan zhravan changed the title Css/enhancements feat(queue): add retry logic and consumer lifecycle management to task queues Jan 12, 2026
@zhravan zhravan requested a review from raghavyuva January 12, 2026 18:31
@zhravan zhravan self-assigned this Jan 12, 2026
@zhravan zhravan marked this pull request as ready for review January 12, 2026 18:31
@zhravan zhravan changed the title feat(queue): add retry logic and consumer lifecycle management to task queues feat(queue): support retry logic and consumer lifecycle management to task queues Jan 12, 2026
@zhravan zhravan changed the title feat(queue): support retry logic and consumer lifecycle management to task queues feat(queue): support retry logic and consumer lifecycle mgmt for queues Jan 12, 2026
@zhravan zhravan changed the title feat(queue): support retry logic and consumer lifecycle mgmt for queues feat(queue): support consumer lifecycle mgmt for queue & set retry count 1 Jan 13, 2026
@zhravan zhravan changed the title feat(queue): support consumer lifecycle mgmt for queue & set retry count 1 feat(queue): support consumer lifecycle mgmt for queue & set retry to 1 Jan 13, 2026
@raghavyuva raghavyuva merged commit 18ab776 into feat/develop Jan 14, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants