Skip to content

Conversation

@EddyLXJ
Copy link
Contributor

@EddyLXJ EddyLXJ commented Oct 27, 2025

Summary:
X-link: meta-pytorch/torchrec#3488

X-link: https://github.com/facebookresearch/FBGEMM/pull/2068

As title
If one table is using feature score eviction in one tbe, then all tables in this tbe need to use the same policy. Feature score eviction can support ttl based eviction now. This diff is adding support no eviction in feature score eviction policy.

Differential Revision: D84660528

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 27, 2025

Deploy Preview for pytorch-fbgemm-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit fa90a7a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/pytorch-fbgemm-docs/deploys/690bdbda70cc57000721eed0
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-5059--pytorch-fbgemm-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@meta-codesync
Copy link
Contributor

meta-codesync bot commented Oct 27, 2025

@EddyLXJ has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating Diff in D84660528.

@meta-cla meta-cla bot added the cla signed label Oct 27, 2025
EddyLXJ added a commit to EddyLXJ/torchrec that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2025
Summary:
X-link: pytorch/FBGEMM#5059


X-link: facebookresearch/FBGEMM#2068

As title
If one table is using feature score eviction in one tbe, then all tables in this tbe need to use the same policy. Feature score eviction can support ttl based eviction now. This diff is adding support no eviction in feature score eviction policy.

Differential Revision: D84660528
EddyLXJ added a commit to EddyLXJ/FBGEMM-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2025
Summary:

X-link: meta-pytorch/torchrec#3488

X-link: facebookresearch/FBGEMM#2068

As title
If one table is using feature score eviction in one tbe, then all tables in this tbe need to use the same policy. Feature score eviction can support ttl based eviction now. This diff is adding support no eviction in feature score eviction policy.

Differential Revision: D84660528
EddyLXJ added a commit to EddyLXJ/torchrec that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2025
Summary:
X-link: pytorch/FBGEMM#5059


X-link: facebookresearch/FBGEMM#2068

As title
If one table is using feature score eviction in one tbe, then all tables in this tbe need to use the same policy. Feature score eviction can support ttl based eviction now. This diff is adding support no eviction in feature score eviction policy.

Differential Revision: D84660528
EddyLXJ added a commit to EddyLXJ/FBGEMM-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2025
Summary:

X-link: meta-pytorch/torchrec#3488

X-link: facebookresearch/FBGEMM#2068

As title
If one table is using feature score eviction in one tbe, then all tables in this tbe need to use the same policy. Feature score eviction can support ttl based eviction now. This diff is adding support no eviction in feature score eviction policy.

Differential Revision: D84660528
Summary:

X-link: meta-pytorch/torchrec#3488

X-link: facebookresearch/FBGEMM#2068

As title
If one table is using feature score eviction in one tbe, then all tables in this tbe need to use the same policy. Feature score eviction can support ttl based eviction now. This diff is adding support no eviction in feature score eviction policy.

Differential Revision: D84660528
EddyLXJ added a commit to EddyLXJ/torchrec that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2025
Summary:
X-link: pytorch/FBGEMM#5059


X-link: facebookresearch/FBGEMM#2068

As title
If one table is using feature score eviction in one tbe, then all tables in this tbe need to use the same policy. Feature score eviction can support ttl based eviction now. This diff is adding support no eviction in feature score eviction policy.

Differential Revision: D84660528
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant