PEP 791: mark as accepted, final edits

[skirpichev]

• SC/PEP Delegate has formally accepted/rejected the PEP and posted to the Discussions-To thread
• Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Accepted)
• Status changed to Accepted/Rejected
• Resolution field points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post, including the date (e.g. `01-Jan-2000 <https://discuss.python.org/t/12345/100>`__)
• Acceptance/rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments
• Discussions-To, Post-History and Python-Version up to date

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4671.org.readthedocs.build/

---

https://pep-previews--4671.org.readthedocs.build/pep-0791/

[skirpichev]

CC @NeilGirdhar, @tim-one, @serhiy-storchaka

I hope you are ok with changing the Author field. Let me know if you aren't or would like to change final text somehow.

[tim-one]

Looks good to me! Thanks for enduring this process 😄.

[hugovk]

@warsaw Before merge, please could you clarify the decision on intmath?

Re: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-791-imath-module-for-integer-specific-mathematics-functions/92548/164

[skirpichev]

BTW, please don't merge without acknowledgment/approval from Serhiy.

[warsaw]

@warsaw Before merge, please could you clarify the decision on intmath?

Re: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-791-imath-module-for-integer-specific-mathematics-functions/92548/164

I suggest making it clearer in that text that the intmath package being described is a separate backport package on PyPI.