Skip to content

Change widget fromt cluster.up() to cluster.apply() #866

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 28, 2025

Conversation

LilyLinh
Copy link
Contributor

Issue link

Jira

What changes have been made

Change widget fromt cluster.up() to cluster.apply()

Verification steps

Checks

  • I've made sure the tests are passing.
  • Testing Strategy
    • [x ] Unit tests
    • [ x] Manual tests
    • Testing is not required for this change

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 28, 2025
@LilyLinh LilyLinh marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2025 11:54
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 28, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from chipspeak and pawelpaszki July 28, 2025 11:54
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.47%. Comparing base (89c47c3) to head (a529488).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #866   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.47%   92.47%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines        1396     1396           
=======================================
  Hits         1291     1291           
  Misses        105      105           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pawelpaszki
Copy link
Contributor

verified the changes across all demo notebooks. Looks good!

Copy link
Contributor

@chipspeak chipspeak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Great work, Linh!

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 28, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chipspeak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 28, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 0ac44ed into project-codeflare:main Jul 28, 2025
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants