Track stake distribution across epochs #42
Conversation
|
That's mostly the snapshots data though. The actual changes aren't that large, though the diff on the import command is perhaps hard to read. |
|
I imagine that's going to be a recurring problem for this kind of work; Random idea: what if we stored snapshot tests in a separate but closely related repo, perhaps with a git submodule, to keep diffs less intimidating? |
|
We could have them as git sub modules I suppose. Those tests are ignored by default anyway because they require a synchronised node ledger database to run. So they can easily be taken out of the main source code. |
As well as their issuers, necessary for performing rewards calculations later on.
Also, use preprod snapshot from epoch 165, so that reward calculation can happen using the stake distribution of epoch 163, which is already in Conway and therefore, doesn't include any of the stake credential pointers.
…well. We're starting to need the whole ledger state for the rewards and stake distribution calculation. In particular, the rewards calculated during the epoch needs to be added to the accounts at the epoch boundary. Similarly, the reserves and treasury need to extracted and tracked.
… vs reward provenance.
Still, unregistered rewards are missing and needs to be added eventually.
KtorZ
force-pushed
the
ledger/stake-distr
branch
from
a2b7e9d to
6e98f7f
Compare
|
As discussed off-band, merging this, so we can move on with other stuff on top. It isn't complete (still missing rewards calculation), but current |
No description provided.