Revert using workflow_run #814
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This reverts commit 4174800, reversing changes made to 79c6b92. Signed-off-by: Hanno Becker <[email protected]>
hanno-becker
force-pushed
the
revert-workflow-run
branch
13 times, most recently
from
5548ce9 to
af1d92b
Compare
Preparation for a subsequent commit calling them from base.yml. Signed-off-by: Hanno Becker <[email protected]>
mkannwischer
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
workflow triggered by workflow_run wont be rendered in a PR, which is not ideal.
We should probably go with resuing workflows instead
Steps:
If your pull request consists of multiple sequential changes, please describe them here:
Performed local tests:
lintpassingtests allpassingtests benchpassingtests cbmcpassingDo you expect this change to impact performance: Yes/No
If yes, please provide local benchmarking results.