Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix secondary voltage control in case of generator remote voltage control #1165

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

geofjamg
Copy link
Member

@geofjamg geofjamg commented Jan 6, 2025

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?

No

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bug fix

What is the current behavior?

Secondary voltage control outer failed in case a zone has generators belonging to a shared remote control.

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
All generators of a secondary voltage control, have local voltage control.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration steps are described in the following section

What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)

Other information:

@geofjamg geofjamg changed the title [WIP] Fix secondary voltage control in case of generator remote voltage con… Fix secondary voltage control in case of generator remote voltage control Jan 8, 2025
@geofjamg geofjamg added bug Something isn't working Release 03/2025 labels Jan 8, 2025
Copy link
Member

@jeandemanged jeandemanged left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved, however note that this is a limited review:
I am not a user of this feature. Therefore I can only assess that code/test/doc quality is good as usual, and that no side effect would occur when secondaryVoltageControl is disabled. Regarding fitness for purpose you are on your own here.

geofjamg and others added 6 commits January 24, 2025 08:12
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <[email protected]>
…e settings are modified only when the option is active

Signed-off-by: Didier Vidal <[email protected]>
@vidaldid-rte vidaldid-rte force-pushed the fix_svc_with_remote_voltage branch from aed86cb to d69c800 Compare January 24, 2025 07:12
@vidaldid-rte vidaldid-rte merged commit 2c7c092 into main Jan 24, 2025
8 checks passed
@vidaldid-rte vidaldid-rte deleted the fix_svc_with_remote_voltage branch January 24, 2025 07:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working Release 03/2025
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants