Open
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Awesome, thank you! I am in favour of disabling highlighting for inline code (not all of that is Typst code, to begin with) and disabling highlighting for block code without I will have to review the preprocessors code prior to merging this, so expect it to take a while (I am quite busy at the moment). |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See running version with highlight there: https://sitandr.github.io/polylux/book/dynamic/syntax.html
I'm not sure, maybe it will be better to disable highlighting inline code, especially considering that
#varand#fn()are colored differently. I guess it should be up to you, so I've left two lines commented inbook.toml(the second one is for the case you are lazy putting```typat code blocks everywhere.