Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RFC: New instruction for the reservation of asset classes/IDs #35
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
RFC: New instruction for the reservation of asset classes/IDs #35
Changes from 2 commits
93bcae2
796cbf2
9d9c4b9
9ec98b2
49923ad
36b2591
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would instead call this
AcquireAssetId
, since:a) you're not actually creating any assets; and
b) you're appointing a controller for the given asset class/ID.
Alternatives are:
OccupyAssetId
SeizeAssetId
TakeAssetId
AppointAssetIdAdmin
ProcureAssetId
ObtainAssetId
My favourites are
ReserveAssetId
andHoldAssetId
, however these clash with pre-existing terminology.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about
CreateAssetId
orCreateAssetType
orCreateAssetClass
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think you're really creating anything so much as priming some namespace which is already yours to do so by virtue of the origin.
Perhaps
InitializeAsset
orSetupAsset
..