-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
refactor: Bump prettier from 2.0.5 to 3.5.3 #9671
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: alpha
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Bumps [prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) from 2.0.5 to 3.5.3. - [Release notes](https://github.com/prettier/prettier/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/prettier/prettier/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](prettier/prettier@2.0.5...3.5.3) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: prettier dependency-type: direct:development update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
🚀 Thanks for opening this pull request! |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## alpha #9671 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 93.00% 92.97% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 187 187
Lines 15082 15110 +28
Branches 174 174
==========================================
+ Hits 14027 14049 +22
- Misses 1043 1049 +6
Partials 12 12 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
What did this PR require? Only upgrading the dependency? I thought it was more because the definitions check failed. I assume all the other changes are because you ran lint:fix? |
I upgraded the dependency and ran prettier + lint |
🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.✅ security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details) |
Warning Rate limit exceeded@dblythy has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 9 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (91)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@mtrezza how do you think we should handle this? |
Pull Request
Issue
Closes: #9625
Approach
Tasks