Skip to content

Conversation

@petermueller
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What if the user is hostile?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You mean like sanitizing the original URL?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah and validation too. Let's talk about it at 4p. A couple of people made the same decision. Within the scope of this challenge, its sufficient but there's a bigger lesson about handling user input here.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oooh. If they setup up the remote server's url to return something in the status field that would be interpreted and run, instead of the normal status codes?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants