-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
[PoC]: Multi-directional refusal supression with Self-Organizing Maps #196
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
kabachuha
wants to merge
21
commits into
p-e-w:master
Choose a base branch
from
kabachuha:som
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
21 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6ebabc7
obtain multiple resid directions with SOMs
kabachuha 3ad2917
use multidirection in optuna optimizer
kabachuha bf5f2ac
multi-directional ablation
kabachuha 46c320a
add SOM params to config template
kabachuha 85a6eb0
som is relative import
kabachuha e012bb9
tensor to cpu for numpy
kabachuha 7f3b941
match minisom args to reference code
kabachuha ce1c589
permute layers and directions
kabachuha 94b858c
duplicate de-duplicated neurons
kabachuha a2a209c
fixup suggest float count
kabachuha dad69df
print parameter lists
kabachuha 07655cd
correspond the layers count to vanilla code
kabachuha 31378cb
layerwise direction interpolation
kabachuha 3b111e8
fixup cases with not full normalization
kabachuha 001006d
config template consistent with fields
kabachuha c37a046
style guide
kabachuha c02869a
use repeat instead of expand for duplication
kabachuha 9b2d068
layer index clamping
kabachuha 0be6b87
som neurons retrieval through win map
kabachuha e8338ca
gemini is stupid
kabachuha 444edec
fix non-som path
kabachuha File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need to be able to control the X/Y dimensions separately? On average, we should expect the flattened topology to approximate a circle over many runs, so it seems one setting for both dimensions should be enough.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This (x,y) setting sat on the original project, so I took it. https://github.com/pralab/som-refusal-directions#3-run-self-organizing-map