proposal: store and maintain element count in oc_list #120
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Maintaining a count along an
oc_listcomes up a number of times in the codebase, so it may be useful to add that to theoc_liststruct itself. Having that would also allow reverse indexed for loops on list (although this usecase it a lot less frequent)@rdunnington @Parzival-3141 @Skytrias what do you think? And would it cause problems with the language bindings (since it modifies the length of the list struct and might not map 1-to-1 to language native constructs)
Needed if we agree this is a good idea:
list.leninsteadapi.json