Move Journal storage loading to a Web Worker - #1321
Closed
c-bata wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
Conversation
c-bata
marked this pull request as draft
August 12, 2026 15:26
c-bata
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 14, 2026 02:12
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
StorageWorkerClientfor storage workers.Scope
This PR focuses on the Journal backend Worker migration. SQLite Worker migration, OPFS, and the SQLite wasm spike are intentionally left for follow-up work.