Skip to content

Conversation

@ulferts
Copy link
Contributor

@ulferts ulferts commented Jan 6, 2026

Ticket

https://community.openproject.org/wp/70142

What are you trying to accomplish?

  • Rename all occurrences of 'Project status' to 'Status.
    • This is only done for 'en' as the other locales will have to be renamed in crowdin
    • The (project) status widget is included in the renaming as the change itself is small but not doing it would be more work now and risk missing places later. /cc @myabc

@ulferts ulferts force-pushed the bug/70142-inconsistent-label-for-status-and-project-status branch from 6dbccb0 to 9b4745c Compare January 6, 2026 13:00
@myabc
Copy link
Contributor

myabc commented Jan 6, 2026

@ulferts FYI #21539 touches the same code.

@ulferts ulferts marked this pull request as ready for review January 6, 2026 14:24
Copy link
Contributor

@EinLama EinLama left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Double checked all occurrences. Could not find any missed places within the English locale.

Appreciate renaming some of the spec descriptions. There are some additional specs that are still using 'project status', but only in their descriptive strings. Since they don't break the tests and are still understandable, I think they can be left as is.

There is quite a number of guides that still use "project status" as term, but many of these also include now outdated screenshots. Probably a task better suited for marketing to select the proper image material.
EDIT: I saw in the work package that this has been addressed 😉

@ulferts ulferts merged commit 4e4125e into release/17.0 Jan 6, 2026
18 checks passed
@ulferts ulferts deleted the bug/70142-inconsistent-label-for-status-and-project-status branch January 6, 2026 15:48
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 6, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants