Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove field naming #7

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 26, 2018
Merged

Remove field naming #7

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 26, 2018

Conversation

mikebell90
Copy link
Contributor

New excessive rules in 6.7.0

@mikebell90 mikebell90 requested a review from adamzr September 26, 2018 16:31
<!-- Too agressive! For example serialNumberUUID is wrong -->
<exclude name="FieldNamingConventions" />
<!-- misguided attempt to avoid boolean setter getter confusion -->
<exclude name="LinguisticNaming" />
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Really, this seems reasonable, what issues did we run into?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It hit a lot of fp on david's stuff. As a general rule I'm being conservative on this stuff

@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@
<exclude name="GenericsNaming" />
<!-- Way too picky @Goofy("star") vs @Goofy(value = "star") is ok -->
<exclude name="UnnecessaryAnnotationValueElement" />
<!-- Too agressive! For example serialNumberUUID is wrong -->
<exclude name="FieldNamingConventions" />
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's configurable, we could modify the regex patterns.

@mikebell90 mikebell90 merged commit ca5b275 into master Sep 26, 2018
@mikebell90 mikebell90 deleted the RemoveFieldNaming branch September 26, 2018 17:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants