Skip to content

OSSM 6707- Update cert-manager doc for OCP cert-manager's supported istio-csr #94843

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: service-mesh-docs-main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shreyasiddhartha
Copy link
Contributor

@shreyasiddhartha shreyasiddhartha commented Jun 17, 2025

Change type: Doc update; Update cert-manager doc for OCP cert-manager's supported istio-csr

Doc JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSSM-6707

Fix Version: service-mesh-docs-main and service-mesh-docs-3.1

Doc Preview: https://94843--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-service-mesh/latest/install/ossm-cert-manager.html#ossm-installing-cert-manager_ossm-cert-manager

SME Review/QE Review:
Peer Review:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 17, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jun 17, 2025

@shreyasiddhartha
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label service-mesh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the service-mesh Label for all Service Mesh PRs label Jun 17, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 18, 2025

@shreyasiddhartha: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
service-mesh Label for all Service Mesh PRs size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants