Skip to content

OSDOCS-14341-attributes: Fixed unrendered IBM attributes #94841

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

@dfitzmau dfitzmau commented Jun 17, 2025

I've tried various ways to get the IBM attributes to render in headings but no matter where I relocate the attributes include or the guidance from our doc, these changes do not work. Best to try hard-coding to avoid the unrendered attributes on docs.redhat.com.

I'm trialing the changes on the 4.13 branch as the ultimate test is publication on docs.redhat.com.

Version(s):
4.13

Issue:
OSDOCS-14341

Preview:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 17, 2025
@dfitzmau dfitzmau force-pushed the OSDOCS-14341-attributes branch 4 times, most recently from 4aad640 to 69795da Compare June 17, 2025 13:19
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jun 17, 2025

🤖 Thu Jun 19 08:33:23 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://94841--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@dfitzmau dfitzmau force-pushed the OSDOCS-14341-attributes branch from 69795da to 8c7172a Compare June 17, 2025 13:50
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 17, 2025
@dfitzmau dfitzmau force-pushed the OSDOCS-14341-attributes branch 4 times, most recently from bf69552 to 0c6e426 Compare June 18, 2025 13:26
@dfitzmau dfitzmau added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jun 18, 2025
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Jun 18, 2025
@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

@dfitzmau LGTM. I examined a number of the IBM install files and searched for unrendered attributes, {i, for the rest. Everything looks good to me.

@mburke5678 mburke5678 added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Jun 18, 2025
@dfitzmau dfitzmau force-pushed the OSDOCS-14341-attributes branch from 0c6e426 to c157e3b Compare June 19, 2025 08:14
@dfitzmau dfitzmau force-pushed the OSDOCS-14341-attributes branch from c157e3b to d74b057 Compare June 19, 2025 08:26
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 19, 2025

@dfitzmau: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@dfitzmau dfitzmau merged commit 784857e into openshift:enterprise-4.13 Jun 19, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.13 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants