-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: describe Curb activities w/ table #69
base: release-1.0.0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
docs: describe Curb activities w/ table #69
Conversation
| no stopping | not a typical travel lane | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | | ||
| travel | represents curbside lanes intended for moving vehicles, like bus lanes, bike lanes, and rush-hour-only travel lanes | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@schnuerle , this does a good job of representing my problem w/ no stopping vs travel. In this model, they represent the same thing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Love the table, nice work! For the "?" you could use the Emoji White Question Mark or even Wavy Dash to show it's not clearly defined.
In my mind, these activities that are used for defining rules for curb policy, no stopping and travel are different, beyond what the table currently shows, maybe more about physical build. An example "travel" area by the curb could be a flush curb to the travel lane of a road, while a no stopping rule could apply to a curb cut in an area that is never a normal travel lane. I'm not sure of the policy differences and needs between these rule definitions of 'travel' vs 'no stopping' - maybe you just want to be clear that this zone at this time of day is a travel lane and be clear about that, vs just a no stopping area?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've replaced the question mark w/ the emoji. I think I got the right wavy one. Let me know if I'm off
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
while a no stopping rule could apply to a curb cut in an area that is never a normal travel lane.
If you can't stop there and you can't travel there, I'm not sure what you could do there. I can think of one example of such a situation, but it suggests we ought to have a no travel
activity instead of a travel
one. It also bends the definition of a curb:
A promenade or large sidewalk-like area could have a no travel
activity defined for all non-municipal car-like classes and a no parking
policy defined for scooters.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems that temporary uses that block use of the curb, such parklets for outdoor dining, or a construction lay down area could represent an opportunity to use the proposed no travel
activity, as only using no stopping
could communicate that the curb lane could still be utilized in some fashion as a travel lane.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, local jurisdictions will need to do some translation work to fit local regulatory practices to CDS. As an example, in SF we use no stopping
on signage to designate curb space that is temporarily permitted for moving trucks to stop and conduct loading
activity.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@schnuerle and @kenyaw , check out the #64 discussion for the continuation on this
…ture-release-work-1
Moving this to a future release to see what activity changes might be needed and how a table can best help clarify. |
zaneclark seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account. You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it. |
Note the question marks emphasizing areas of debatable coverage