Skip to content

8351997: AArch64: Interpreter volatile reference stores with G1 are not sequentially consistent #1905

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Jun 19, 2025

Fixes AArch64 memory ordering problem. Readily manifests in new jcstress tests; there are sightings of related problems in JSR 133 tests. The patch is not clean, because JDK-8301996 is in the way, and it is IMO too risky to backport. I resolved some hunks to match the intended behavior, after checking do_oop_store clobbers the same r3 as in mainline.

Additional testing:

  • Linux AArch64 server release, jcstress RefDekker test now passes
  • Linux AArch64 server release, jcstress seqcst.volatiles.ref tests now pass
  • Linux AArch64 server release, jcstress all tests now pass
  • Linux AArch64 server fastdebug, all

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8351997 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8351997: AArch64: Interpreter volatile reference stores with G1 are not sequentially consistent (Bug - P2 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1905/head:pull/1905
$ git checkout pull/1905

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1905
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1905/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1905

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1905

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1905.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

Reviewed-by: shade, aph, fbredberg
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 19, 2025

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 19, 2025

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8351997: AArch64: Interpreter volatile reference stores with G1 are not sequentially consistent

Reviewed-by: phh, aph, eosterlund

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 37 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 83b15da2eb3cb6c8937f517c9b75eaa9eeece314 8351997: AArch64: Interpreter volatile reference stores with G1 are not sequentially consistent Jun 19, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 19, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 19, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 19, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 19, 2025

⚠️ @shipilev This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

@theRealAph, @fisk -- take a look as well?

Copy link

@fisk fisk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

/approval request Fixes the corner case in AArch64 interpreter, manifests as memory model problem. jcstress RefDekker and seqcst.volatiles.ref fail without the fix, pass with it. All other tests also pass. The change was in mainline for 3 weeks without bugtail. Even though the fix is relatively fresh, it is well-understood. 21u version differs a bit from mainline version, see 21u PR.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 24, 2025

@shipilev
8351997: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Jun 24, 2025
@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

Push approval granted. Here we go.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 30, 2025

Going to push as commit 729f100.
Since your change was applied there have been 37 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 30, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 30, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 30, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 30, 2025

@shipilev Pushed as commit 729f100.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants