Skip to content

8343426: ConcurrentSkipListMap.spliterator() can no longer split the stream #1895

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

satyenme
Copy link

@satyenme satyenme commented Jun 17, 2025

Backporting JDK-8343426: ConcurrentSkipListMap.spliterator() can no longer split the stream. Since Java 10, the trySplit() method for spliterators for the ConcurrentSkipListMap always returned null, causing parallel streams to be broken for ConcurrentSkipListMap and ConcurrentSkipListSet since. This change fixes the logic for considering the head.node.next field in addition to head.node. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2, and new test directly. Patch is clean.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8343426 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8343426: ConcurrentSkipListMap.spliterator() can no longer split the stream (Bug - P3 - Rejected)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1895/head:pull/1895
$ git checkout pull/1895

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1895
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1895/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1895

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1895

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1895.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 17, 2025

👋 Welcome back ssubramaniam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 17, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 2b57f402c46104d4aba784a891ba90604f5e9e4c 8343426: ConcurrentSkipListMap.spliterator() can no longer split the stream Jun 17, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 17, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 17, 2025

⚠️ @satyenme This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 17, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 17, 2025

Webrevs

@satyenme
Copy link
Author

/approval request for backport of JDK-8343426: ConcurrentSkipListMap.spliterator() can no longer split the stream

Motivation: Without this change the trySplit() method for spliterators for ConcurrentSkipListMaps and ConcurrentSkipListSets using parallel streams will remain broken. With the change, the pre-Java 10 functionality will be restored, fixing the current buggy implementation. It's possible someone's written code that depends on the buggy implementation (which always returns null), but quite unlikely.

Risk: Low. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2, and new test directly. Patch is clean. Change has been present in tip since November, 2024.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 17, 2025

@satyenme
8343426: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Jun 17, 2025
@GoeLin
Copy link
Member

GoeLin commented Jun 18, 2025

Hi @satyenme
can you please

  • annotate the change that broke this issue in JBS (caused by link)
  • do a dependent pull request for the follow-up bug fix?
  • mention the dependent pull request in your fix request message
    Thanks for the good risk assessment.

@satyenme
Copy link
Author

Took a look through the git history, having a hard time pinpointing the exact breaking change between Java 9 and 10. Planning to take a second look, in the meantime opened a PR for the referenced follow up issue: #1906. Will get that reviewed and re-create approval request here (and create one there)

@phohensee
Copy link
Member

#1906 appears to include the JDK-8344253 backport. You can use "/issue add JDK-8344253" to update 1906 to include the 8344253 backport, then close this one in favor of 1906.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the approval label Jun 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants