Repository navigation
Conversation
Gave up spatialization to focus on independant tillers
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello @rbarillot,
In the perspective to have tillers and their nodal roots' subset as progressively plant subparts, needed to add the possibility to explicitly simulate tillers, independently of Main Stem's functioning.
This requiered heavy edits on the model and simulation files of each model, so an expert review is surely needed to check I did not forget something ;)
For now, until I wire each axis' xylem and phloem to specific root subsets, we still use Main Stem's xylem and phloem as unique and homogeneous plant pools.
(@pradal might help to converge with hydroroot as well)