feat: check for specific UUID version

[hazrid93]

Closes #1299.

Add a uuidVersion(version, message?) action that takes a version (1 8) and validates the string is a UUID of that version by checking the version digit (the first character of the third group). It returns a standard validation action with a version specific regex. The existing uuid action is unchanged.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Added UUID version validation for versions 1–8.
  • Invalid UUID versions now produce validation issues with optional custom messages.
  • Added public exports for the new validation functionality.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0172414b-c884-4de9-8e62-f809664e530c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 90bc2c7 and 8117744.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• library/src/actions/index.ts
• library/src/actions/uuidVersion/index.ts
• library/src/actions/uuidVersion/uuidVersion.ts

---

Walkthrough

Adds a uuidVersion action that validates typed dataset values against version-specific UUID regular expressions and records validation issues for mismatches. Defines its public types, issue shape, action shape, and overloaded factory signatures. Re-exports the action from its module entry point and the aggregated actions index.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the main change: adding validation for specific UUID versions.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The PR adds version-specific UUID validation and checks the version digit in the third segment as requested by issue #1299.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	The changes stay within the requested UUID version validation feature and its exports, with no clear unrelated additions.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[cubic-dev-ai]

No issues found across 3 files

_{Re-trigger cubic}