Capabilities API - #86
Merged
Merged
Conversation
onx2
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 14, 2026 01:12
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Move table capability registration into the table subsystem while preserving the existing high-level APIs.
Capability-based registration is now available for cases where the source type does not fully describe the desired bindings:
Direct convenience methods are also supported:
Capabilities are checked at compile time through
WithInsert,WithDelete, andWithUpdate. For example, bindingdeleteorupdateto an event table fails to compile.Existing APIs such as
add_table,add_view, andadd_event_tableremain available for higher-level setup. Duplicate accessor/capability registrations fail at configuration time with a precise error message.