Feature parity updates

[lealobanov]

Closes: #???

Description

> Task :flow:compileIosMainKotlinMetadata
w: file:///Users/lealobanov/Desktop/Projects/flow-kmm/flow/src/iosMain/kotlin/org.onflow.flow.models/NSData.kt:11:10 Expected performance impact from inlining is insignificant. Inlining works best for functions with parameters of function types.
w: file:///Users/lealobanov/Desktop/Projects/flow-kmm/flow/src/iosMain/kotlin/org.onflow.flow.models/NSData.kt:14:19 This declaration needs opt-in. Its usage should be marked with '@kotlinx.cinterop.BetaInteropApi' or '@OptIn(kotlinx.cinterop.BetaInteropApi::class)'
w: file:///Users/lealobanov/Desktop/Projects/flow-kmm/flow/src/iosMain/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/infrastructure/FixedPointFormatter.kt:7:1 'expect'/'actual' classes (including interfaces, objects, annotations, enums, and 'actual' typealiases) are in Beta. You can use -Xexpect-actual-classes flag to suppress this warning. Also see: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-61573

> Task :flow:compileKotlinIosArm64 FAILED
e: file:///Users/lealobanov/Desktop/Projects/flow-kmm/flow/src/commonMain/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/crypto/Crypto.kt:7:1 Expected Crypto has no actual declaration in module <org.onflow.flow:flow> for Native
e: file:///Users/lealobanov/Desktop/Projects/flow-kmm/flow/src/commonMain/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/crypto/Keys.kt:6:1 Expected KeyPair has no actual declaration in module <org.onflow.flow:flow> for Native
e: file:///Users/lealobanov/Desktop/Projects/flow-kmm/flow/src/commonMain/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/crypto/Keys.kt:11:1 Expected PrivateKey has no actual declaration in module <org.onflow.flow:flow> for Native
e: file:///Users/lealobanov/Desktop/Projects/flow-kmm/flow/src/commonMain/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/crypto/Keys.kt:18:1 Expected PublicKey has no actual declaration in module <org.onflow.flow:flow> for Native

Looks like we will need to add iOS analog methods for the Crypto implementation added to replace functionality that was previously handled by Flow-JVM on Android.

---

For contributor use:

• Targeted PR against master branch
• Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
• Updated relevant documentation
• Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
• Added appropriate labels

[lealobanov]

Is there a reason why the Address class was set to private? Would like to replace FlowAddress import from Flow JVM SDK.

[lealobanov]

@lmcmz

[lmcmz]

it should be public, I think we should get rid of flow jvm.

[lealobanov]

Hi @lmcmz,
https://github.com/onflow/flow-kmm/blob/15167f38c5fd2b51c21bcba6f5f17e8e90f35e0f/flow/src/commonMain/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/models/AccountPublicKey.kt

Is there a specific reasons fields like sequence_number, weight, index are set to type String in flow-kmm? Flow-JVM assumes Int type for these fields, so I am having to cast a lot of values .toInt() to work with some of the AccessAPI endpoints. I am working on phasing these out to use methods from flow-kmm instead, just wondering if there was a specific decision why String was used.

Thanks!

[lmcmz]

Sorry, for late reply for this.
The kmm use http rpc directly, the api return in string format.
I'm happy to convert into int, we need add some custom decoder
https://developers.flow.com/http-api#tag/Accounts/paths/~1accounts~1%7Baddress%7D/get

[lmcmz]

it should be public, I think we should get rid of flow jvm.

[lmcmz]

Great work!
Is it possible to add a unit test to sign a real tx to testnet chain ?