Recommend UACCESS tag instead of plugdev group #86
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The plugdev group suggested to use for the device files is specific to Debian based Linux distributions and doesn't exist on a lot of others. To keep the system setup consistent the UACCESS tag is recommended now.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
plugdevgroup suggested to use for the device files is specific to Debian based Linux distributions and doesn't exist on a lot of others. To keep the system setup consistent theUACCESStag is recommended now.Some issues of other projects facing this for reference:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571599
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/68533
OpenHantek/openhantek#80
Yubico/libu2f-host#116