Skip to content

Conversation

@amackillop
Copy link
Contributor

Was seeing this upon running npm ci or npm install:

Installing dependencies
npm warn reify invalid or damaged lockfile detected
npm warn reify please re-try this operation once it completes
npm warn reify so that the damage can be corrected, or perform
npm warn reify a fresh install with no lockfile if the problem persists.
npm warn reify invalid or damaged lockfile detected
npm warn reify please re-try this operation once it completes
npm warn reify so that the damage can be corrected, or perform
npm warn reify a fresh install with no lockfile if the problem persists.
npm warn reify invalid or damaged lockfile detected
npm warn reify please re-try this operation once it completes
npm warn reify so that the damage can be corrected, or perform
npm warn reify a fresh install with no lockfile if the problem persists.

Not sure what went wrong by looking at the diff. Just a lot of platform specific packages being deleted mostly.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

"optionalDependencies": {
"@moneydevkit/lightning-js-android-arm-eabi": "0.1.54",
"@moneydevkit/lightning-js-android-arm64": "0.1.54",
"@moneydevkit/lightning-js-darwin-arm64": "0.1.54",
"@moneydevkit/lightning-js-darwin-x64": "0.1.54",

P2 Badge Restore non-Linux optional deps in lockfile

This optionalDependencies list still declares non-Linux binaries (e.g., @moneydevkit/lightning-js-darwin-*/win32-*), but this commit removes their node_modules/@moneydevkit/lightning-js-… entries elsewhere in the lockfile. That leaves dangling references with no resolved/integrity metadata, so the lockfile no longer fully specifies installs on macOS/Windows (or other non-Linux targets) and will need regeneration there. If the intent wasn’t to make the lockfile Linux-only, the removed platform entries should be restored.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@amackillop amackillop marked this pull request as draft December 31, 2025 21:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants