Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: rename core to spec #8

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix: rename core to spec #8

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

baxen
Copy link
Collaborator

@baxen baxen commented Feb 27, 2025

Renaming core to spec to clarify organization (#6) and to avoid naming conflicts on crates.io

This is to clarify the separation of concerns. It also
helps avoid a name conflict on crates.io
@baxen baxen changed the title Baxen/rename core fix: rename core to spec Feb 27, 2025
@AdamSimpson AdamSimpson mentioned this pull request Feb 28, 2025
@stevohuncho
Copy link

I run the mcp-core crate and was wondering if we could collaborate and solve this issue so this could be the official mcp-core

@RWDai
Copy link

RWDai commented Mar 1, 2025

I run the mcp-core crate and was wondering if we could collaborate and solve this issue so this could be the official mcp-core我运行了 mcp-core crate,想知道我们能否合作解决这个问题,这样就可以成为官方的 mcp-core

you delete you mcp-core package?

@cbrit
Copy link

cbrit commented Mar 4, 2025

Somewhat related, I mentioned in #17 using generated bindings from the official spec's JSON schema rather than the current hand-rolled types. I've published a simple version at https://crates.io/crates/mcp-types, if there is interest, happy to remove so the name can be used. mcp-spec is nice too.

@stevohuncho
Copy link

@baxen I'm the author of that crate and I don't mind changing it as long as all of these crates will be live on crates.io and this project is production ready as I currently run remote SSE mcp servers with my crate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants