polytomy filtering for triplets not trees #16
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When running QuIBL on an empirical dataset with trees for short regions (~500 bp; 20 species) I noticed that most trees were ignored because they contained polytomies. I thought that it is unnecessary to discard the whole tree in that case, because most of the triplets in the tree are not affected by the polytomy and could be used. I changed the code so that trees with polytomies are now used, but each of the triplets in the tree is tested for whether it contains a polytomy, and the triplet is ignored if it does. Does this make sense? I'm not sure whether my changes interfere with other parts of the code. I would be thankful if you could comment. If there's a good reason to ignore all trees with polytomies, please just let me know and reject my pull request.