Skip to content

chore: roll 1.53.0 #1801

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 28 commits into from
Jun 12, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Skn0tt
Copy link
Member

@Skn0tt Skn0tt commented Jun 11, 2025

No description provided.

@Skn0tt Skn0tt self-assigned this Jun 11, 2025
@Skn0tt Skn0tt changed the title chore: roll 1.53.0 beta 1749131401000 chore: roll 1.53.0-beta-1749131401000 Jun 11, 2025
@Skn0tt Skn0tt changed the title chore: roll 1.53.0-beta-1749131401000 chore: roll 1.53.0 Jun 11, 2025
@Skn0tt Skn0tt marked this pull request as ready for review June 11, 2025 12:40
@Skn0tt Skn0tt requested a review from dgozman June 11, 2025 12:44
@Skn0tt Skn0tt requested a review from yury-s June 11, 2025 15:57
options.recordHarContent = null;
options.recordHarUrlFilter = null;
} else {
if (options.recordHarOmitContent != null) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where did these checks go?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dropped them accidentally! good catch. I added them back in.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, I guess there are no tests for this 😄

@@ -44,7 +43,7 @@ private LocatorAssertionsImpl(Locator locator, boolean isNot) {
public void containsClass(String classname, ContainsClassOptions options) {
ExpectedTextValue expected = new ExpectedTextValue();
expected.string = classname;
expectImpl("to.contain.class", expected, classname, "Locator expected to contain class", convertType(options, FrameExpectOptions.class));
expectImpl("to.contain.class", expected, classname, "Locator expected to contain class", convertType(options, FrameExpectOptions.class), "Assert \"containsClass\"");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe "assertThat().containsClass()" ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@@ -60,13 +60,6 @@ void shouldBeAbleToGenerateOutline(@TempDir Path tempDir) throws IOException {
assertTrue(outlineSize > noOutlineSize, "Unexpected sizes: " + outlineSize + " noOutline: " + noOutlineSize);
}

@Test
@DisabledIf(value="com.microsoft.playwright.TestBase#isChromium", disabledReason="skip")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we now support pdf in ff and wk?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see why it can't be tested on the client end even if the place where the error is thrown was moved to the server.

Copy link
Member Author

@Skn0tt Skn0tt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

addressed

this.baseUrl = new URL(spec);
} catch (MalformedURLException e) {
this.baseUrl = null;
void setRecordHar(Path path, HarContentPolicy policy) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This one should not be used anymore.

options.recordHarContent = null;
options.recordHarUrlFilter = null;
} else {
if (options.recordHarOmitContent != null) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, I guess there are no tests for this 😄

@Skn0tt Skn0tt merged commit 4698b91 into microsoft:main Jun 12, 2025
24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants