Skip to content

[QNN EP] Add ONNX ScatterElements support #24811

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

quic-tirupath
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • Translate ONNX ScatterElements as QNN's ScatterElements Op
  • Handle unsupported reduction value i.e., "min"
  • Add unit tests to verify ScatterElements Op support on HTP

 - Translate ONNX ScatterElements as QNN's ScatterElements Op
 - Handle unsupported reduction value i.e., "min"
 - Add unit tests to verify ScatterElements Op support on HTP
@edgchen1 edgchen1 added the ep:QNN issues related to QNN exeution provider label May 20, 2025
@HectorSVC
Copy link
Contributor

/azp run Linux QNN CI Pipeline,Win_TRT_Minimal_CUDA_Test_CI,Windows ARM64 QNN CI Pipeline,Windows GPU Doc Gen CI Pipeline,Windows x64 QNN CI Pipeline

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 5 pipeline(s).

@HectorSVC
Copy link
Contributor

Please check the doc to make sure there are no steps missing: https://onnxruntime.ai/docs/execution-providers/QNN-ExecutionProvider.html#add-new-operator-support-in-qnn-ep
For example, make sure the DQ->CumSum->Q is treat as a single node unit, so it's running as quantized CumSum instead of FP32 in FP16 mode on HTP. Another recent example is: #24659

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ep:QNN issues related to QNN exeution provider
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants