Skip to content

chore: Use coverage.py sources_dir setting #2942

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

edgarrmondragon
Copy link
Collaborator

@edgarrmondragon edgarrmondragon commented Mar 31, 2025

Summary by Sourcery

Update coverage configuration to use the newer sources_dir setting in coverage.py

Enhancements:

  • Migrate from deprecated source to source_dirs configuration in coverage.py

Chores:

  • Update coverage package version to 7.8 to support new configuration syntax

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://meltano-sdk--2942.org.readthedocs.build/en/2942/

Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the coverage.py configuration to use the source_dirs setting instead of source. It also updates the coverage package version to 7.8 in pyproject.toml and uv.lock.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Configured coverage.py to use the source_dirs setting instead of source.
  • Replaced the source setting with source_dirs in the tool.coverage.run section of pyproject.toml.
  • Updated the coverage package version from 7.4 to 7.8 in the testing dependencies.
pyproject.toml
Updated coverage package version in uv.lock.
  • Updated the coverage package version from 7.4 to 7.8.
uv.lock

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.08%. Comparing base (af063ea) to head (e36f1e2).
Report is 18 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2942      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.45%   91.08%   -0.37%     
==========================================
  Files          63       70       +7     
  Lines        5288     5690     +402     
  Branches      675      738      +63     
==========================================
+ Hits         4836     5183     +347     
- Misses        319      355      +36     
- Partials      133      152      +19     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 31, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #2942 will not alter performance

Comparing edgarrmondragon/chore/coverage-source-dirs (e36f1e2) with main (af063ea)

Summary

✅ 7 untouched benchmarks

@edgarrmondragon edgarrmondragon self-assigned this Mar 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant